Analysis of Students' Preferences for Digital Applications in the Context of Learning Spoken English among Private University Students in Banda Aceh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55616/jetli.v4i2.716Keywords:
Digital Applications, Speaking Skills, Private UniversitiesAbstract
This study delves into analyzing student preferences regarding using digital applications in the context of English language speaking skills among undergraduate students at private universities in Banda Aceh. Based on a mixed-methods approach, the research explores the complex interplay between student preferences, the usage of digital applications, and the consequent language learning outcomes. Findings reveal diverse preferences among the student population, with a significant proportion favoring traditional classroom-based learning while a growing segment leans towards digital methods. The study also highlights the relationship between preferences and the extent of digital application utilization, shedding light on the factors influencing these choices. The research underscores the significance of accommodating diverse learning preferences in language education and acknowledges the potential of digital applications in enhancing speaking skills. It provides valuable insights for educators and institutions aiming to optimize language learning programs, ensuring a balanced and practical approach in the ever-evolving landscape of language education.
References
Al Hashimi, S., Al Muwali, A., Zaki, Y., & Mahdi, N. (2019). The effectiveness of social media and multimedia-based pedagogy in enhancing creativity among art, design, and digital media students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(21), 176-190. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i21.10596
Alam, A. (2020). Possibilities and Challenges of Compounding Artificial Intelligence in India’s Educational Landscape. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(5), 5077–5094. http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/13910
Azizah, H., Muliawati, I., & Yusnida, D. (2021). Students’ Perception Toward The Online English Learning Process During Covid-19. Journal of English Teaching and Linguistics, 2(2), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.55616/jetli.v2i2.95
Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and artificial intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a human-in-the-loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, p. 3, 100068.
Bibri, S. E., & Jagatheesaperumal, S. K. (2023). Harnessing the Potential of the Metaverse and Artificial Intelligence for the Internet of City Things: Cost-Effective XReality and Synergistic AIoT Technologies. Smart Cities, 6(5), 2397–2429. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6050109
Bojinski, S., Verstraete, M., Peterson, T. C., Richter, C., Simmons, A., & Zemp, M. (2014). The concept of essential climate variables in support of climate research, applications, and policy. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 95(9), 1431-1443. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00047.1
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
Chen C. M., Wang J. Y., Chen Y. C. (2014). Facilitating English-language reading performance by a digital reading annotation system with self-regulated learning mechanisms. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 102–114. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.17.1.102.pdf
Christensen, L. B., Johnson, B., Turner, L. A., & Christensen, L. B. (2011). Research methods, design, and analysis.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Curelaru, M., Curelaru, V., & Cristea, M. (2022). Students’ perceptions of online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative approach. Sustainability, 14(13), 8138. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138138
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?" Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges, and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice, and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115.
Eslit, E. R. (2023). Voyaging Beyond Chalkboards: Unleashing Tomorrow's Minds through AI-Driven Frontiers in Literature and Language Education.
Farrell, T. S., & Martin, S. (2009). To Teach Standard English or World Englishes? A Balanced Approach to Instruction. In English teaching fórum (Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 2-7). US Department of State. Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Office of English Language Programs, SA-5, 2200 C Street NW, 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20037.
Fawns, T. (2019). Postdigital education in design and practice. Postdigital science and education, 1(1), 132-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0021-8
Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., & Guzzo, T. (2020). Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emergencies. Societies, 10(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040086
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and higher education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Gentles, S. J., Charles, C., Ploeg, J., & McKibbon, K. A. (2015). Sampling in qualitative research: Insights from an overview of the methods literature. The qualitative report, 20(11), 1772-1789. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2373
Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Chasing the butterfly effect: Informal language learning online as a complex system.
Hariharasudan, A., & Kot, S. (2018). A scoping review on Digital English and Education 4.0 for Industry 4.0. Social sciences, 7(11), 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7110227
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting education in “educational” apps: Lessons from the science of learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615569721
Huang, N. E. (2014). Hilbert-Huang transform and its applications (Vol. 16). World Scientific.
Islam, M. S., & Stapa, M. B. (2021). Students’ low proficiency in spoken English in private universities in Bangladesh: reasons and remedies. Language Testing in Asia, 11, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00139-0
Jelena, A. L., & Ana, N. (2019). Designing e-learning environment based on student preferences: conjoint analysis approach. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 7(3), 37-47.
Jiang, Q., Yuen, M. & Horta, H. (2020). Factors Influencing Life Satisfaction of International Students in Mainland China. Int J Adv Counselling 42, 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-020-09409-7
Joshi, A., Vinay, M., & Bhaskar, P. (2021). Impact of coronavirus pandemic on the Indian education teachers' perspectives teachers on online teaching and assessments. Interactive technolintelligentnd innovative education, 18(2), 205-226.
Jowsey, T., Foster, G., Cooper-Ioelu, P., & Jacobs, S. (2020). Blended learning via distance in pre-registration nursing education: A scoping review. Nurse education in Practice, 44. 102775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102775
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/5er8f
Kasuma, S. A. A. (2017). Four characteristics of Facebook activities for English language learning: A study of Malaysian university students’ needs and preferences. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(3), 155-171. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.3p.155
Kumar, T. (2020). Approaches in Teaching Writing Skills with Creative Writing: A TESOL Study for Indian Learners. TESOL International Journal, 15(5), 78–98.
Lancaster, R. W. (2017). A comparison of student-centered and teacher-centered learning approaches in one alternative learning classroom environment. Arkansas State University.
Lee, S., Kuo, L. J., Xu, Z., & Hu, X. (2022). The effects of technology-integrated classroom instruction on K-12 English language learners’ literacy development: a meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5-6), 1106-1137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1774612
Matkasimova, D. B. K., & Makhmudov, K. S. U. (2020). Importance of interactive methos in the English language grammar teaching. Science and Education, 1(2), 95-98. https://openscience.uz/index.php/sciedu/article/view/50
Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
Mismara, J. (2019). Students’ Perception of Using Social Media For Learning English (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh).
Mulyani, M., Fidyati, F., Suryani, S., Suri, M., & Halimatussakdiah, H. (2021). University students' perceptions through e-learning implementation during COVID-19 pandemic: Positive or negative features dominate?, Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.17628
Reich, J., Buttimer, C. J., Fang, A., Hillaire, G., Hirsch, K., Larke, L. R., ... & Slama, R. (2020). Remote learning guidance from state education agencies during the COVID-19 pandemic: A first look.
Rizka, B., & Lismalinda, L. (2021). THE EFFECT OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING MODEL ON THE SOCIOLINGUISTICS LEARNING OUTCOMES OF PRIVATE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN ACEH. Getsempena English Education Journal, 8(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v8i1.1197
Rizka, B., & Lismalinda, L. (2023). MOTIVASI BELAJAR DAN PERCAKAPAN BAHASA INGGRIS MELALUI MEDIA FILM DENGAN METODE DUBBING DAN SUBTITLING DI SMAN 6 BANDA ACEH. Ikhlas: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(2), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.55616/ikhlas.v1i2.617
Rubin, A., & Bellamy, J. (2012). Practitioner's guide to using research for evidence-based practice. John Wiley & Sons.
Sharifi, M., Rostami AbuSaeedi, A., Jafarigohar, M., & Zandi, B. (2018). Retrospect and the prospect of computer-assisted English language learning: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(4), 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1412325
Soomro, K. A., Kale, U., Curtis, R., Akcaoglu, M., & Bernstein, M. (2020). Digital divide among higher education faculty. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(21), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00191-5
Tan, K. H., Farashaiyan, A., Sahragard, R., & Faryabi, F. (2020). Implications of English as an International Language for Language Pedagogy. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p22
Tseng, S. S., & Yeh, H. C. (2019). The impact of video and written feedback on student preferences of English speaking practice.
Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2017). The effect of games and simulations on higher education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(22), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0062-1
Wang, Y., Fang, W.-C., Han, J., & Chen, N.-S. (2016). Exploring the affordances of WeChat for facilitating teaching, social and cognitive presence in semi-synchronous language exchange. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2640
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2012). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In Motivation and self-regulated learning (pp. 1-30). Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Journal of English Teaching and Linguistics