Dynamic Performance Comparison of Conventional and Interleaved Boost Converters under Partial Shading

Authors

  • Zya Jamaluddin Al Rasyid AR Politeknik Negeri Semarang
  • Novix Jefri Al Fama

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55616/ajeetech.v6i1.1185

Keywords:

Boost converter, interleaved boost converter, partial shading, LT3757, LTC3787

Abstract

Photovoltaic (PV) panels under partial shading experience rapid input voltage changes that disturb maximum power point tracking (MPPT). This study aims to compare the performance of a conventional boost converter (LT3757) and a two‑phase non‑synchronous interleaved boost converter (LTC3787) for a 100 Wp PV system (nominal input 17.7 V, output 24 V). A dynamic simulation was performed in LTspice with input voltage stepping from 17.7 V to 8.5 V (simulating partial shading) and back, while simultaneously switching the load resistance (5.76 Ω for 100 W, 11.52 Ω for 50 W). Measured parameters include input current ripple, efficiency, undershoot, overshoot, and settling time. Results show that the interleaved converter achieves 14% lower input current ripple during the shading transition (6.54 A vs. 7.74 A), much shorter settling time (648 µs vs. 3386 µs), and keeps the output voltage within the ±2% tolerance band throughout the transient, whereas the conventional converter violates the band. Efficiency is nearly identical for both converters (≈96% at 100 W, ≈95% at 50 W). Mathematical analysis reveals that the higher steady‑state ripple of the interleaved converter is due to a ripple cancellation factor of only 0.603 at D=0.284 and the smaller inductors (3.3 μH vs. 6.8 μH). It is concluded that for small‑scale off‑grid PV systems frequently affected by partial shading, the interleaved converter is recommended because of its superior dynamic performance.

References

[1] R. S. Magdaleno, P. A. Sanchez-Perez, J. L. Z. Ramirez Cruz, D. M. Escobar, and A. Sanchez-Juarez, “Influence of partial shading on the power output of a solar cell and a PV module,” in 2018 IEEE 7th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCPEC) (A Joint Conference of 45th IEEE PVSC, 28th PVSEC & 34th EU PVSEC), IEEE, Jun. 2018, pp. 1324–1327. doi: 10.1109/PVSC.2018.8547680.

[2] A. A. Al-Samawi, A. S. Atiyah, and A. H. Al-Jrew, “Power Optimization of Partially Shaded PV System Using Interleaved Boost Converter-Based Fuzzy Logic Method,” Eng, vol. 6, no. 8, p. 201, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.3390/eng6080201.

[3] H. M. H. Farh, A. M. Eltamaly, and M. S. Al‐Saud, “Interleaved boost converter for global maximum power extraction from the photovoltaic system under partial shading,” IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1232–1238, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2018.5256.

[4] M. A. G. De Brito, L. Galotto, L. P. Sampaio, G. De Azevedo Melo, and C. A. Canesin, “Evaluation of the main MPPT techniques for photovoltaic applications,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1156–1167, 2013, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2012.2198036.

[5] T. Mizan Sya’rani, T. M. A. Pandria, and Syukri, “Pengaruh Suhu Terhadap Kinerja Panel Surya: Literature Review,” Aceh Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology, vol. 5, 2025.

[6] N. Amna, T. Murisal Asyadi, Muliadi, and Syukri, “Konfigurasi Seri Paralel dan Honey Combination Pada Kondisi Mismatch I-V Modul Surya,” Aceh Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology, vol. 5, 2025.

[7] R. Gupta, Ruchika, S. Gauta, and M. Kumar, “Comparative Analysis of Boost and Interleaved Boost Converter for PV Application,” in 2022 2nd International Conference on Emerging Frontiers in Electrical and Electronic Technologies, ICEFEET 2022, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2022. doi: 10.1109/ICEFEET51821.2022.9848264.

[8] M. Kumar, G. Panda, and D. V. S. Krishna Rao, “Analysis of Conventional and Interleaved Boost Converter with Solar Photovoltaic System,” in 2022 International Conference on Intelligent Controller and Computing for Smart Power, ICICCSP 2022, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2022. doi: 10.1109/ICICCSP53532.2022.9862351.

[9] D. J. S. Newlin, R. Ramalakshmi, and S. Rajasekaran, “A performance comparison of interleaved boost converter and conventional boost converter for renewable energy application,” in 2013 International Conference on Green High Performance Computing (ICGHPC), IEEE, Mar. 2013, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICGHPC.2013.6533924.

[10] P. de A. Sobreira Jr., F. L. Tofoli, H. A. C. Braga, P. G. Barbosa, and A. A. Ferreira, “Analysis Of Mppt Techniques Applied To The Dcm Multiphase Boost Converter For The Mitigation Of Partial Shading In Pv Arrays,” Eletrônica de Potência, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1138–1148, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.18618/REP.2013.4.11381148.

[11] E. Kabalci and A. Boyar, “Highly Efficient Interleaved Solar Converter Controlled with Extended Kalman Filter MPPT,” Energies (Basel)., vol. 15, no. 21, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15217838.

[12] F. Sobrino-Manzanares and A. Garrigós, “Interleaved, Multi-Switch, Multi-Phase Boost Converter For Battery Discharge Regulators,” E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 16, p. 14010, May 2017, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/20171614010.

[13] S. Kaščák, M. Praženica, M. Jarabincová, and R. Koňarik, “Analysis of Four Phase Interleaved Boost Converter,” TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, vol. 6, no. 4, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.14311/tee.2017.4.110.

[14] M. T. Mathew and Z. Ismail, “A Four Level Interleaved Boost Converter with a Voltage Multiplier for High Voltage Applications,” in International Conference on Engineering Technologies and Applied Sciences: Shaping the Future of Technology through Smart Computing and Engineering, ICETAS 2023, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2023. doi: 10.1109/ICETAS59148.2023.10346323.

[15] J. S. A. Rahavi, T. Kanagapriya, and R. Seyezhai, “Design and analysis of Interleaved Boost Converter for renewable energy source,” in 2012 International Conference on Computing, Electronics and Electrical Technologies (ICCEET), IEEE, Mar. 2012, pp. 447–451. doi: 10.1109/ICCEET.2012.6203850.

[16] W.-S. Jeong, C.-Y. Won, and J. Kim, “New Synchronous Rectifier Control Scheme for High Efficiency and Density Interleaved Boost Converter With Passive Soft-Switching Cell,” in 2020 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), IEEE, Mar. 2020, pp. 2129–2135. doi: 10.1109/APEC39645.2020.9124501.

[17] W. S. Jeong, J. Kim, and C. Y. Won, “An Adaptive Synchronous Rectifier Control Scheme for High Power Density High Efficiency Interleaved Boost Converter with Passive Soft-Switching Cell,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 6791–6803, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1109/JESTPE.2021.3064839.

[18] A. Devices Inc, “LT3757 – Wide input range, current mode, boost/flyback/SEPIC controller,” 2016. [Online]. Available: www.analog.com

[19] Vishay Siliconix, “Si7852DP N-Channel 80-V (D-S) MOSFET,” May 2001. [Online]. Available: www.vishay.com

[20] Vishay General Semiconductor, “MBR20xxxCT-E3, MBRF20xxxCT-E3, MBRB20xxxCT-E3 Vishay General Semiconductor Dual Common-Cathode High Voltage Trench MOS Barrier Schottky Rectifier,” Sep. 2013. [Online]. Available: www.vishay.com

[21] A. Devices Inc, “LTC3787 PolyPhase Synchronous Boost Controller,” 2021. [Online]. Available: www.analog.com

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Jamaluddin Al Rasyid AR, Z. ., & Al Fama, N. J. (2026). Dynamic Performance Comparison of Conventional and Interleaved Boost Converters under Partial Shading . Aceh Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology, 6(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.55616/ajeetech.v6i1.1185

Issue

Section

Articles