The Use of Flow Chart on Students’ Writing at the Grade 10 of SMAS WITAMA Pekanbaru

Authors

  • Robby Ibrahim SMAS Witama Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55616/jetli.v3i2.223

Keywords:

Flow chart, Writing, Descriptive Text

Abstract

The students at grade 10 of SMAS Witama Nasional Plus Pekanbaru had some problems in writing. Based on my observation they were hard to share and develop their ideas in writing. I tried to prove the problem by using Flow chart in teaching writing descriptive text. The purpose of this research is to identify whether the students who received in class instruction of flow chart method of writing had different skill in writing descriptive text than students who did not receive instruction of the method at the. This research was Quasi Experimental research. The population of this research was the grade 10 of SMAS Witama Nasional Plus Pekanbaru The numbers of population was 180 students and the sample of this research was 54 students; Experimental class was 10 IPA 1consisting 28 students, and Control class was 10 IPS 1consisting 26 students. After conducting this research by using Flow chart, the result of this research is the post-test score of experimental class was getting higher than pre-test score. It can be seen from the average post-test score of experimental class was 68.21, that improved from pre-test score 52.78. The average post-test on control class was 56.76 was lower than Experimental class. As the conclusion, there was different ability the students who received in class instruction of flow chart in writing descriptive text than students who did not receive instruction of flow chart.

References

Arsyad, A. (2003). Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT.Raja Grafindo Persada.

Bamidele, E. F. (2013). Comparative Effectiveness of Flowchart Hierarchical, and Spider Concept Mapping Strategies on Students’ Performance in Chemistry. Retrieved on March.2013. From http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/wje/article/view/2441

Boardman, C.A. (2002). Writing to Communicate: Paragraph and Essay. 3rd ed. USA: Pearson Edition. Inc.

Brown, H.D. (2000). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. San Francisco: Longman.

Ching, L.C. (2004). Using Concept Maps to Gauge Students' Understanding. TESL Journal, 10(3). Retrieved on March.2013 from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Lee_ConceptMaps/

Creswell. J. W. (2005). Educational Research. New Jersey: Person Education International.

Davison, D. (2003). Learning to Teach English in the Secondary School. London: Routledge Falmer.

Fitria, N., & Monita, M. (2022). Using Writing Process Approach (WPA) to Improve the Eight Grade Students’ Ability in Mastering Writing Descriptive Text: An Experimental Study at SMP Negeri 1 Simeulue Barat. Journal of English Teaching and Linguistics, 3(1), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.55616/jetli.v3i1.263

Harmer, J. (2007). How to Teach. London: Longman.

Hebb, N. (2009). What is Flowchart. Retrieved on March 2013 from http://www.breezetree.com/articles/what-is-a-flow-chart.html

Johnson, A.P. (2008). Teaching Reading and Writing: A Guidebook for Tutoring and Remediating Students. USA: A Division of Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Kane, T. (2002). The Oxford: Essential Guide to Writing. New York: Oxford University Press. Inc.

Meltzer, D.E. (2002). The relationship between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physic: A possible: “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest score. American Journal, 70(12). 1259-1268

Murni. (2010). The Effect of Using flowchart Toward Students' Vocabulary at the Second Year Students of SLTP Budi Dharma Dumai. [Unpublished thesis]. Pekanbaru: UIN SUSKA.

Fitriani, N., & Sabarniati, S. (2021). Motivational Writing Problems of College Students in English Class. Journal of English Teaching and Linguistics, 2(2), 84-90. https://doi.org/10.55616/jetli.v2i2.144

Ningsih, Herliya. 2011. Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa dengan Model Think Pair Share pada Materi Sumber Daya Alam dan Penggunaannya di Kelas V SD Negeri 06 Tampan Pekanbaru. [Unpublished thesis]. Pekanbaru: Lancang Kuning University.

Nunan, D. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teacher. Sydney: Prentice Hall.

Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing Academic English. 4th Ed. USA: Pearson.

Siregar, A. (2020). M-Learning Device: Using Video to Improve Students’ Writing Skill. Journal of English Teaching and Linguistics, 1(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.55616/jetli.v1i1.8

Sugiyono. (2010). Statiska Untuk Penelitian. Bandung. CV. Alfabeta.

Syafi’i, S. (2007). The Effective Paragraph Developments: The Process of Writing for Classroom Settings. Pekanbaru.

Usman, H. (2000). Pengantar Statistika. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Usman, M.B. (2002). Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Ciputat Pers.

Vera, R. (2010). Using Flowchart to Increase Students Ability in Writing Descriptive text at the second year of SLTPN 2 Bungaraya. [Unpublished thesis]. Pekanbaru: UIN SUSKA.

Wishon, G.E. (1980). Let’s Write English. USA: Litton Educational Publishing. Inc

Yenti, L.R. (2007). A Study on the Ability of the Second Years Students of SLTPN 2 Pekanbaru in Writing Short Paragraph Based on Flowchart. [Unpblished thesis]. Pekanbaru: UNRI.

Zahrowi, A. (2009). Descriptive text. Retrieved on April 2013 from http://ahmadzahrowi.wordpress.com/mapel/descriptive-text/

Zaurah. (2012). The Effect of Using Flowcharts on the Students’ Writing Ability in Narrative Text at the Second Year of SMPN 16 SIAK Regency. [Unpblished thesis]. Pekanbaru: UIN SUSKA.

Zulkarnain. (2010). Statiska Penelitian. Pekanbaru: Cendekia Insani Pekanbaru.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31

How to Cite

Ibrahim, R. (2022). The Use of Flow Chart on Students’ Writing at the Grade 10 of SMAS WITAMA Pekanbaru. JETLi: Journal of English Teaching and Linguistics, 3(2), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.55616/jetli.v3i2.223

Issue

Section

Articles