Perbandingan Perilaku Seismik Struktur High-Rise Beton Bertulang dengan Penerapan Base Isolator LRB dan FPS

Authors

Hegar Wahyu Pamungkas Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Nurul Rochmah Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55616/prince.v4i3.1102

Keywords:

Base Isolation, Lead Rubber Bearing (LRB), Friction Pendulum System (FPS), etabs, Reinforced Concrete Structure

Abstract

Banda Aceh is located in a region with high seismic activity due to the interaction between the Indo-Australian and Eurasian plates, making high-rise buildings in this area require a reliable earthquake-resistant structural design. This study aims to analyze and compare the dynamic behavior of reinforced concrete structures using Lead Rubber Bearing (LRB) and Friction Pendulum System (FPS) base isolation systems against the conventional fixed-base system. The modeling was carried out on a 10-story apartment building using ETABS v.17, referring to SNI 1726:2019, SNI 1727:2020, and SNI 2847:2019 standards. The analysis results show that the base isolation systems reduce inter-story drift by up to 77% for FPS and 49% for LRB compared to the fixed-base model, but increase the total structural displacement with maximum values reaching 2254% for LRB and 1889% for FPS due to isolator movement. Furthermore, the base shear force increased approximately 3.16 times for LRB and 3.40 times for FPS compared to the fixed-base system. The use of isolation also significantly extends the structural vibration period, with the largest increase in the first mode reaching 77% for LRB and 67% for FPS. Overall, the implementation of base isolation effectively enhances structural flexibility and seismic response while reducing potential structural and non-structural damage in earthquake-prone regions.

References

[1] A. Alwani and C. F. Adianto, “Bangunan Tinggi Di Indonesia Yang Dirancang Tahan Gempa,” J. Econ. Bus. Eng., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 105–112, 2021, doi: 10.32500/jebe.v3i1.2053.

[2] M. Yuliyanti, R. K. Natalia, C. P. Pradani, D. Anggraeni, S. P. Astuti, and I. F. Setyaningrum, “Earthquake Disaster Mitigation Strategy : Lessons Learned from Indonesia,” pp. 1465–1472, 2019.

[3] R. Trimurtiningrum, G. Sarya, H. Widhiarto, H. W. Rohaniawan, and M. H. Masruri, “Analisis Kinerja Gedung Beton Bertulang Dengan Variasi Penempatan Dinding Geser Terhadap Beban Gempa,” Axial J. Rekayasa Dan Manaj. Konstr., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 061, 2023, doi: 10.30742/axial.v11i3.3255.

[4] Imad Shakir, Mohammed Ahmed Jasim, and Sardasht S. Weli, “High Rise Buildings: Design, Analysis, and Safety,” Int. J. Archit. Eng. Technol., vol. 8, no. March, pp. 1–13, 2021, doi: 10.15377/2409-9821.2021.08.1.

[5] A. Di Egidio, S. Pagliaro, C. Fabrizio, and A. M. de Leo, “Seismic performance of frame structures coupled with an external rocking wall,” Eng. Struct., vol. 224, no. December 2019, p. 111207, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111207.

[6] A. De Luca and L. G. Guidi, “State of art in the worldwide evolution of base isolation design,” Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., vol. 125, no. September 2018, p. 105722, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105722.

[7] Y. Lu et al., “Simplified procedures for seismic design verification and evaluation of lead rubber bearing base-isolated buildings based on free-vibration response,” Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.1002/tal.1751.

[8] A. Ziraoui, B. Kissi, H. Aaya, and I. Azdine, “Seismic behavior of base-isolated building structures with lead rubber bearings (LRBs),” Procedia Struct. Integr., vol. 61, no. 2023, pp. 171–179, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2024.06.023.

[9] B. Arian, Tavio, and D. Iranata, Studi Efektifitas Aplikasi Lrb Pada Modifikasi Struktur Gedung The Alton Apartment (Tower 3) 15 Lantai Dengan Metode Pracetak, no. Tower 3. 2021.

[10] M. R. Shiravand, H. Ketabdari, and M. Rasouli, “Optimum arrangement investigation of LRB and FPS isolators for seismic response control in irregular buildings,” Structures, vol. 39, pp. 1031–1044, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.03.070.

[11] C. A. Barrera-Vargas, I. M. Díaz, J. M. Soria, and J. H. García-Palacios, “Enhancing friction pendulum isolation systems using passive and semi-active dampers,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 16, 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10165621.

[12] N. Makris, “Seismic isolation: Early history,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 269–283, 2019, doi: 10.1002/eqe.3124.

[13] F. A. Suryawinata, T. F. Tirtosugondo, G. Ghewa, D. Widianto, and D. Hartanto, “Pengaruh Penggunaan High Damper Rubber Bearing Pada Gedung Bertingkat Ditinjau Terhadap Level Kinerja Struktur Dengan Metode Analisis Time History (Studi Kasus: Pembangungan Gedung Hotel),” G-Smart, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 82–93, 2023, doi: 10.24167/gsmart.v6i2.4466.

[14] K. H. Gupta, “Seismic Base Isolation For Earthquake Resistant Structure,” vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 36–46, 2019.

[15] A. Syarif, B. Piscesa, and H. Sugihardjo, Modifikasi Perencanaan Office Tower Olive Dengan Base Isolator Tipe Friction Pendulum System (Fps) Dan Terletak Di Jayapura. 2020.

[16] N. and Kelly, “Design of Seismic Isolated Structures: From Theory to Practice,” Earthq. Spectra, vol. 16, no. 3, 1999, [Online]. Available: http://earthquakespectra.org/doi/abs/10.1193/1.1586135

Downloads

Published

11/27/2025

How to Cite

Wahyu Pamungkas, H., & Rochmah, N. (2025). Perbandingan Perilaku Seismik Struktur High-Rise Beton Bertulang dengan Penerapan Base Isolator LRB dan FPS. Journal of Planning and Research in Civil Engineering, 4(3), 765–776. https://doi.org/10.55616/prince.v4i3.1102