Analisis Perbandingan Kapasitas Lentur Balok Komposit Berdasarkan SNI 1729:2015 dan SNI 1729:2020

Authors

Ahmad Sumantri Politeknik Negeri Medan
Ainil Mardhiyah Politeknik Negeri Medan
Nova Juliana Politeknik Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55616/prince.v4i3.1088

Keywords:

Composite Beam, Flexural Capacity, SNI 1729:2015, SNI 1729:2020, Steel Structure

Abstract

Composite steel-concrete structures are widely applied in modern construction due to their material efficiency, high strength-to-weight ratio, and reliable structural performance. As design demand evolve, the Indonesian National Standard (SNI) continues to be updated to enhance safety and consistency in structural design. One significant revision occurred in SNI 1729:2020, which replaced SNI 1729:2015 and introduced changes in material strength provisions, strength-reduction factors, and flexural capacity calculations for composite members. However, quantitative studies examining the impact of these updates remain limited. This study aims to analyze and compare the flexural capacity of composite beams based on manual calculations following SNI 1729:2015 and SNI 1729:2020. Several types of steel girders with variations in span length and slab thickness were evaluated. The results indicate a very high level of equivalence between the nominal and factored flexural capacities obtained from both standards. All girder types produced identical values, demonstrating that no difference exists in the level of conservatism in estimating the flexural capacity of composite elements. Nevertheless, the use of SNI 1729:2020 is recommended due to its improved structure, alignment with the international standard ASIC 360-16, and harmonization with other updated SNI provisions, which collectively enhance the reliability of steel structural design in Indonesia

References

[1] I. M. Ahmed and K. D. Tsavdaridis, “The evolution of composite flooring systems: applications, testing, modelling and eurocode design approaches,” J Constr Steel Res, vol. 155, pp. 286–300, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.01.007.

[2] Q. H. Alsultan et al., “Innovative Composite Materials for Improving Structural Integrity and Longevity in Civil Engineering Applications,” KHWARIZMIA, vol. 2023, pp. 63–72, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.70470/KHWARIZMIA/2023/006.

[3] W. Liu, “Application of High Performance Composite Materials in Optimum Design of Civil Engineering Structure,” International Journal of Engineering Technology and Construction, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 10–19, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.38007/ijetc.2023.040202.

[4] V. Margarita, “Modern Approaches To The Use Of Composite Materials In Construction,” The American Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 57–65, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.37547/tajet/Volume06Issue07-07.

[5] G. Mengesha, “Advances in Composite Structures: A Systematic Review of Design, Performance, and Sustainability Trends,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2025, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5033311.

[6] A. Moskaleva, S. Gusev, S. Konev, I. Sergeichev, A. Safonov, and E. Hernandez-Montes, “Composite freeform shell structures: Design, construction and testing,” Compos Struct, vol. 306, p. 116603, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116603.

[7] D. K. Rajak, D. D. Pagar, R. Kumar, and C. I. Pruncu, “Recent progress of reinforcement materials: a comprehensive overview of composite materials,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 6354–6374, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.068.

[8] U. Kuhlmann, S. Breunig, L.-M. Gölz, V. Pourostad, and L. Stempniewski, “New developments in steel and composite bridges,” J Constr Steel Res, vol. 174, p. 106277, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106277.

[9] Dumaria, F. Lubis, and W. Apriani, “Evaluation of building structure planning using SNI 1726:2019 and SNI 2847:2019 in earthquake-prone areas,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 1321, no. 1, p. 012024, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1321/1/012024.

[10] H. Medriosa and F. A. Akbar, “Analisis Struktur Gedung Irna (Instalasi Rawat Inap) Rumah Sakit Umum Pasaman Barat Menggunakan Sni Beton Bertulang 2847:2019 Dan Sni Gempa 1726:2019,” Ensiklopedia of Journal, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 7–14, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.33559/eoj.v3i4.796.

[11] A. Prasetiyo and E. K. Pangestuti, “Analisis Struktur Bangunan Hotel 17 Lantai Daerah Kemayoran Jakarta Dengan Permodelan 3d Software Sap2000,” Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, vol. 3, no. 2, May 2023, doi: 10.53866/jimi.v3i2.237.

[12] A. N. Santoso and M. D. Astawa, “Performance Evaluation Of 34 Floors Building Structure In Surabaya Based On Sni 1726:2012 And Sni 1726:2019,” Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 185–201, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.28932/jts.v18i2.3807.

[13] V. C. Simanjuntak, I. Imran, M. Moestopo, and H. D. Setio, “The Evolution of Seismic Design Provisions in Indonesia’s National Bridge Code,” Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, vol. 54, no. 6, p. 220614, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2022.54.6.14.

[14] Nurul Aina Syahira, “Perbedaan Peraturan Pembebanan Jembatan RSNI T 02 2005 Dan SNI 1725 2016,” Ocean Engineering : Jurnal Ilmu Teknik dan Teknologi Maritim, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 41–56, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.58192/ocean.v2i3.1136.

[15] J. T. Salim and I. D. Sidi, “Comparative Seismic Evaluation of Building Codes: A Case Study on Structural Performance and Safety,” Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 793–807, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2024.56.6.10.

[16] R. Suwondo, C. Christopher, and M. Suangga, “Comparative Analysis of Concrete Mix Design Methods: SNI 03-2834-2000 vs. SNI 7656:2012,” Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 937–942, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.13189/cea.2024.120219.

[17] M. Maizuar, S. R. Indah, T. Mudi Hafli, and B. Burhanuddin, “Studi Desain Elemen Struktur Baja Berdasarkan SNI 1729 : 2015 dan SNI 1729 : 2020,” Malikussaleh Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 6, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.29103/mjmst.v6i2.7079.

[18] N. Loqman, N. A. Safiee, N. A. Bakar, and N. A. M. Nasir, “Structural Behavior of Steel-Concrete Composite Beam using Bolted Shear Connectors: A Review,” MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 203, p. 06010, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201820306010.

[19] S. Zhang, Y. Jia, and Y. Ding, “Study on the Flexural Behavior of Steel-Concrete Composite Beams Based on the Shear Performance of Headed Stud Connectors,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 961, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12070961.

[20] E. Sulistyo, A. V. Hidayat, I. Nurhuda, and Y. A. P, “Pengaruh Dimensi Stud terhadap Kekuatan Penghubung Geser Tipe Stud pada Struktur Komposit Baja - Beton,” Jurnal Karya Teknik Sipil, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 181–189, 2018.

[21] S. D. Afrina and T. A. Putera, “Analisis Perbandingan Shear Connector pada Balok Komposit,” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Teknik, vol. 1, no. 1, 2021.

[22] A. R. Santoso, B. Suswanto, and A. B. Habieb, “Studi Perilaku Floordeck Komposit Baja Akibat Beban Lentur dengan Metode Elemen Hingga,” Jurnal Aplikasi Teknik Sipil, vol. 20, no. 3, p. 343, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.12962/j2579-891X.v20i3.13330.

Downloads

Published

11/27/2025

How to Cite

Ahmad Sumantri, Ainil Mardhiyah, & Nova Juliana. (2025). Analisis Perbandingan Kapasitas Lentur Balok Komposit Berdasarkan SNI 1729:2015 dan SNI 1729:2020. Journal of Planning and Research in Civil Engineering, 4(3), 746–752. https://doi.org/10.55616/prince.v4i3.1088